The Nanoscale World

Bipotetntiostat for an STM

rated by 0 users
Not Answered This post has 0 verified answers | 3 Replies | 2 Followers

Top 150 Contributor
7 Posts
Points 80
Ismael DIEZ Perez posted on Mon, Oct 29 2012 12:28 PM

Hi all, I m trying to get a replacement for my old Picostat (bipotentiostat from Molecular Imaging (now Agilent)). I m wondering if any of u guys know a good alternative for this one, or if any of u has some experience on integrating a regular bipot into the STM configuration. Thanxs a lot!!

 

Isma

  • | Post Points: 12

All Replies

Top 25 Contributor
55 Posts
Points 831
Bruker Employee

Isma,

It depends on your STM system whether an external bipotentiostat would work to support all the functions, seemlessly.  May I have the model of your STM and controller?

Thanks

Chunzeng Li

Applications Scientist
Nano Surfaces Division, Bruker

Top 150 Contributor
7 Posts
Points 80

 

  Chunzeng, I have an old PicoSPM head controlled with a Nanoscope E , very old system, I m wondering if I could replace the PicoStat (old bipot) by a newer bipot with higher performance. Do u think it would be possible?, thanxs a lot

 

Isma

  • | Post Points: 12
Top 25 Contributor
55 Posts
Points 831
Bruker Employee

Isma,

Most likely  Bruker's Universal Bipotentiostat would work, which has more gain stages. The difficulty is, if there is any problem, it can be hard to work out as it requires Agilent and Bruker to solve the problem, if any, together.

Sorry for not being more definitive.

Chunzeng

  • | Post Points: 10
Page 1 of 1 (4 items) | RSS
Copyright (c) 2011 Bruker Instruments