The Nanoscale World

Question regarding tip convolution

rated by 0 users
Not Answered This post has 0 verified answers | 1 Reply | 3 Followers

Top 500 Contributor
2 Posts
Points 26
Corey Thompson posted on Wed, Jun 18 2014 10:53 PM

I am using tapping mode and a RTESPA probe to measure the surface topography of a nanoparticle film. The film consists of spherical nanoparticles that measure roughly 50 nm in diameter in the AFM image. Is this particle diameter accurate? Since the particle is significantly larger than the tip radius of 5 nm, I would expect error due to convolution to be less than 10%. Is this an accurate assumption? I appreciate any help you can provide!

Thanks for your help,

Corey Thompson

  • | Post Points: 12

All Replies

Top 25 Contributor
35 Posts
Points 381

Hi Corey,

you may try to estimate the problem with the tip deconvolution software:
http://confocal-manawatu.pbworks.com/w/page/43681258/AFM%20Deconvolution%20Software

Some of the methods include "blind" deconvolution and will give the "correct" particle shapes without calibration substrate.

To my memory, the NanoScope Analysis has the same function:
http://confocal-manawatu.pbworks.com/w/page/59647324/NanoScope%20Analysis
please correct me if I am wrong.

If the particles are perfectly spherical, the height measurements would be "aberration free" at other imaging parameters (like the stiffness uniformity of the substrate) fixed and satisfy your needs.

Hope that helped,

Dimitri

  • | Post Points: 10
Page 1 of 1 (2 items) | RSS
Copyright (c) 2011 Bruker Instruments