-
I have received a number of questions if FastScan (our High Speed AFM) works with ScanAsyst (our Auto-Optimization algorithms). It does - and this video link demonstrates that by showing unattended high speed imaging on a diverse set of challenging samples. (http://www.youtube.com/user/BrukerNano?feature=mhee#p/u/0/7bi2YEgie_k) In the video are several
-
When compared to other common microscopy techniques (optical, SEM, TEM), the atomic force microscope’s (AFM’s) broad potential for nanoscale imaging and characterization of numerous physical surface properties has been somewhat offset by its slow imaging speed. Thus, the AFM has sometimes been seen as a powerful “specialty tool”
-
PS: A good test of the robustness of a system is to scan Celgard® in different orientations; here is an even faster video (23Hz) where the mesh is perpendicular to the scan. Enjoy, Steve
-
It’s good to see some community attempts at replicating the performance of the Dimension FastScan. The video is of a 1um, 512x512, 23Hz, scan of Celgard® taken with the Dimension FastScan. This demonstration is over twice as fast as the 10Hz video we showed previously, additionally we demonstrate the Celgard® with the mesh oriented a couple
-
HF Etched Mica. The video shows a Survey at 20um @ 4.8Hz, followed by a high resolution image at 4um @ 20Hz, followed by a video at 0.66um 55Hz. Hard flat samples are not that challenging for a high speed system because they don't challenge the z-actuator or slew rate (power) of the electronics.
-
I was reading an AFM site and saw a contrived claim trying to make a comparison that was >50% off the benchmark and thought it would be a good topic to open up for discussion. The comment was to the effect of: by scanning at a slower scan speed we are actually going faster because our poor scanner dynamics require so much rounding we have to make
-
I was reading an AFM site and saw a contrived claim trying to make a comparison that was over 50% off the benchmark and thought it would be a good topic to open up for discussion. The comment was to the effect of: by scanning at a slower scan speed we are actually going faster because our poor scanner dynamics require so much rounding we have to make
-
It’s good to see some community attempts at replicating the performance of the Dimension FastScan. The screen shot below is of a 1um, 512x512, 22Hz, Video of Celgard® taken with the Dimension FastScan (Video link at end). This demonstration is over twice as fast as the 10Hz video we show above. As you start to see different images and movies
-
It’s good to see some community attempts at replicating the performance of the Dimension FastScan. The screen shot below is of a 1um, 512x512, 22Hz, Video of Celgard® taken with the Dimension FastScan (Video link at end). This demonstration is over twice as fast as the 10Hz video we show above. As you start to see different images and movies
-
It’s good to see some community attempts at replicating the performance of the Dimension FastScan. The screen shot below is of a 1um, 512x512, 22Hz, Video of Celgard® taken with the Dimension FastScan (Video link at end). This demonstration is over twice as fast as the 10Hz video we show above. As you start to see different images and movies