-
I was reading an AFM site and saw a contrived claim trying to make a comparison that was >50% off the benchmark and thought it would be a good topic to open up for discussion. The comment was to the effect of: by scanning at a slower scan speed we are actually going faster because our poor scanner dynamics require so much rounding we have to make
-
I was reading an AFM site and saw a contrived claim trying to make a comparison that was over 50% off the benchmark and thought it would be a good topic to open up for discussion. The comment was to the effect of: by scanning at a slower scan speed we are actually going faster because our poor scanner dynamics require so much rounding we have to make
-
It’s good to see some community attempts at replicating the performance of the Dimension FastScan. The screen shot below is of a 1um, 512x512, 22Hz, Video of Celgard® taken with the Dimension FastScan (Video link at end). This demonstration is over twice as fast as the 10Hz video we show above. As you start to see different images and movies
-
It’s good to see some community attempts at replicating the performance of the Dimension FastScan. The screen shot below is of a 1um, 512x512, 22Hz, Video of Celgard® taken with the Dimension FastScan (Video link at end). This demonstration is over twice as fast as the 10Hz video we show above. As you start to see different images and movies
-
It’s good to see some community attempts at replicating the performance of the Dimension FastScan. The screen shot below is of a 1um, 512x512, 22Hz, Video of Celgard® taken with the Dimension FastScan (Video link at end). This demonstration is over twice as fast as the 10Hz video we show above. As you start to see different images and movies
-
This experiment shows 275, 5um, 1024x1024 pixel image, taken at 17Hz (170um/s tip velocity). Each image is analyzed using the blind reconstruction method in the NanoScope SW to determine the estimated tip diameter, and is plotted versus image number. The results show that over this entire 270 image sequence, the tip remains extremely sharp and virtually
-
Nothing like a quality sample preparation (thanks Natalia!) and an awesome AFM to get great soft-sample high-speed images (thanks Shuiqing & Adam!). This new video shows height and phase of freshly prepared Celgard; the images are at ~20um/s (or 10Hz scan rate for 1um images): In the video, we also tried to showcase a lot of the ease-of-use features
-
Nothing like a quality sample preparation (thanks Natalia!) and an awesome AFM to get great soft-sample high-speed images (thanks Shuiqing & Adam!). This new video shows height and phase of freshly prepared Celgard; the images are at ~20um/s or 10Hz scan rate for 1um images. In the video, we also tried to showcase a lot of the ease-of-use features
-
Excerpts of Figure 13.25 and 13.29 from Magonov and Whangbo,"Surface Analysis with STM and AFM," VCH (1996). See video: for FastScan images
-
Interesting debate going on linked-in. Reposting here for comment as well. **** Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE What qualifies a as a high speed AFM? There has been a lot of discussion on what it takes to claim high speed. Should a baseline criteria be to demonstrate at least an order of magnitude improvement over a conventional AFM on