The Nanoscale World

Search

  • Re: Returning to a previously measured location gives different height results

    Thanks for your questions. The image that you provided shows that you are having some tracking issues, noticeably in the left side of the pits, that may be contributing to the histogram data in Depth analysis being a bit choppy. Also, the Histogram Filter Cutoff is set to 0, so any noisy data in the histograms will affect the determination of the peak
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Mark Hilton on Mon, Oct 1 2012
  • Re: Questions about MFM probes

    Hi Chad, 1 The low moment probes have a thinner magnetic coating and may allow slightly improved lateral resolution, although as you mentioned a somewhat weaker response. 2 Imaging on a hard disk magnet won't damage the tip, but depending on the coercivity of the tip it may realign the domains. If the MFM data looks to be typically attractive (not
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Mark Hilton on Sat, Jul 21 2012
  • Re: Problem with download firmware to NSV controller

    Hi 'acurtin', Let me know if you exchanged the DSP and hard drive as you described earlier. If that didn't work then we'll need to swap out the NSV. Best, Mark
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Mark Hilton on Mon, Apr 4 2011
  • Re: Need for solution (SPM, Veeco, Nanoscope-IIIa)

    Hi Vivek, You need to rule out any type of probe alignment issues. Please verify that the probe is snug in the cantilever holder and that you don't have any bending due to heating. You can try loading a stiff, non-coated silicon lever and verify that it does or doesn't drift. If this is a Multimode, make sure the clamp in the optical head is
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Mark Hilton on Thu, Mar 24 2011
  • Re: support note 205- extender hardware and software installation

    Dear Luci, Support note 205 rev C guides you through the board replacements in the Multimode base to upgrade to Phase. The same instructions would be applied to the upgrades for Quadrex, but there may be different boards involved depending on what you are working with. The support note for Quadrex upgrade and installation is 322 rev C. This guides you
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Mark Hilton on Sun, Feb 13 2011
  • Re: Contact time in force measurements

    Hi Catalina, I'll send a link to you in a separate email. Best, Mark
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Mark Hilton on Tue, Dec 21 2010
  • Re: Contact time in force measurements

    Hi Catalina, It looks like John Thornton has given you the direction required for ramp delay in your current version. If you decide to upgrade to a later version as Steve suggested, let me know and I'll provide a link that you can use to acquire the software. Best, Mark Hilton
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Mark Hilton on Mon, Dec 20 2010
  • Re: Nanoscope V530r3sr3 ____ Internal error

    This typically happens when a file gets corrupted. It can be as easy as replacing the system.par file, or more complicated with the vision drivers. Depending on the age of the system, you might have a backup directory of your Nanoscope software that has / Par and / Equip directories. If you do, backup your scanner calibration file from the / Equip directory
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Mark Hilton on Mon, Dec 13 2010
  • Re: NanoLithography

    Hi Weiming, Please contact me directly at afmsupport@bruker-nano.com regarding your litho file issues. I would like to know if you have recently upgraded your software from a version older than 5.31. Also, please send a screen shot of the files that you do have in the root directory of your V5.31 software. The Litho package is an option, and there are
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Mark Hilton on Tue, Nov 16 2010
Page 1 of 1 (9 items) | More Search Options
Copyright (c) 2011 Bruker Instruments