The Nanoscale World

Search

  • Re: How to adjust the engage distance?

    [quote user="lihongzhou"]How to adjust the engage distance? How to make the objective focus on sample surface?[/quote] Look in the TOOLS-ENGAGE SETTINGS-GENERAL. The first value should be 1000 um, and is probably much less (~200...). Change it back to 1000 um. Everything should be ok again. I don't know why it happens but I have seen it
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Joop de Vries on Tue, Feb 21 2012
  • Re: Trouble in startup

    Hi, It looks like you had an update of your Matrox video drivers. Try to restore your system with "System Restore" in Assessoiries" to a date it was working fine. If the program works again, look at the updates that needs to be intalled and exclude the matrox video driver update. If that not the case, I would go for a complete recovery
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Joop de Vries on Tue, Nov 8 2011
  • Re: Tips functionalozed with bacteria

    Perhaps you are already doing it, but do the last washing step of the bacteria with demi water, suspend the centrifuged bacteria in 1 or 2 ml demiwater and use that while gluing the bacteria to the tip with poly L lisine. So while in demi and not in buffer. You have to do this quick, bacteria will not survive long in demi.
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Joop de Vries on Thu, Jul 21 2011
  • Re: z-piezo drift when imaging

    Hello Benoit, The settings are good then. It is in air so all the other remarks are useless Try measuring a calibration grid to see if the stretching is also there. If that is the case recalibrate, if its then still there I suspect something wrong with the piezo.... Best Regards, Joop
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Joop de Vries on Fri, Jul 1 2011
  • Re: z-piezo drift when imaging

    Hi Benoit, I think you should give some more information. Are you measuring in air or liquid? What is your sample? Are you sure your sample is well fixed and is not getting of the support If it is in liquid, can the sample ( e.g. polymer) swell due to the liquid? Is the liquid at room temperature ( summer/airco) Have you tried to decrease the contact
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Joop de Vries on Thu, Jun 30 2011
  • Re: Image processing question

    Jeremy, What you also can do is have a look at the freeware software package from Gwyddion ( http://gwyddion.net/ ). The options you have exporting (save as) is very good, and the Bruker/Veeco/DI files are read without any problem. For publishing pictures I use it a lot. Joop
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Joop de Vries on Wed, Mar 30 2011
  • Re: Lateral noise

    Hello Jeremy, I don't know much about TUNA, but is scanning with a 90 degree angle an option? If it is related to lateral forces, the lines shout increase I expect, if they are the same I expect it to be sample related? But perhaps Stefan can comment on this...... Joop
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Joop de Vries on Tue, Mar 15 2011
  • Re: TESP-HAR imaging problem

    Hello Joshua, Two questions: Are you very sure we are looking at the heigt channel in the TESP-Har picture, and not a error channel (e.g. peak force error)? If I look at the picture can it be a flattening-error, because I think the picture is flatened without excluding the features (hole end the height at the top af the picture). Is there also no hole
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Joop de Vries on Thu, Jan 27 2011
  • Re: Engaging in liquid with the di3100 afm

    I think the problem is in the focusing IN the liquit. The way I do it without any problems: First allign and focus the tip and surface in air, add the liquit, realign the laser ( only the x-as a little couterclockwise) to find the maximum sum back. Then Approach! You will make good contact, but the surface will not be in focus. In the newer software
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Joop de Vries on Sat, Nov 6 2010
Page 6 of 6 (59 items) « First ... < Previous 2 3 4 5 6 | More Search Options
Copyright (c) 2011 Bruker Instruments