The Nanoscale World

Search

  • Re: Frequency Images

    OK John, thanks for the answer, that explains it perfectly! pete
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Peter Eaton on Wed, Jan 30 2013
  • Frequency Images

    I am reading a paper in which the authors used a Dimension Icon (Nanoscope 5) to do MFM. They show what they say are "frequency" images in MFM lift mode. I was not aware that there was a frequency signal. in fact, I thought the drive frequency was fixed, and there wasn't a way to measure directly the oscillation frequency on this system
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Peter Eaton on Wed, Jan 30 2013
  • Re: Nanoparticle size

    This is surprising. Usually the XRD will tend to underestimate the particles size, no overestimate it. If you see features of 2 nm height 15nm across, they are probably spheres. You could do TEM to check (although they are pretty small, you need a reasonably good TEM). I should think the most likely explanation is that the 2nm spheres are there, but
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Peter Eaton on Fri, Jan 25 2013
  • Re: Water purity and nanoparticles on Mica

    Don, I just keep the water close din the fridge. the main thing is to only pour out of the bottle, and keep it closed as much as possible. It should last OK at room temperature as well... Regards, Pete.
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Peter Eaton on Fri, Jan 25 2013
  • Re: Water purity and nanoparticles on Mica

    The water I use is "water for molecular biology", the item code for this is W4502. If this differs from W3513, I cannot be sure, it looks quite similar on the sigma site. But I have tried another water they sold "water for cell culture" W3500, and it was not as good as W4502. The bubble trap I never used. When we dry we use Argon
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Peter Eaton on Wed, Jan 23 2013
  • Re: Strange linear trenches...

    This is a very large scan, with a high Z scale as well. You don't say what the sample is, or the Scanning conditions, but my first thought would be to try a very low scan rate, to compensate for the very long scan lines (i.e. Tip velocity = Scansize x scan rate). You could try scan rates of 0.25 Hz, and see if that helps. Tip and/or sample contamination
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Peter Eaton on Thu, Dec 27 2012
  • Re: offline planefitting question

    I believe that yes, it is exactly the same thing. it would be nice to hear someone from Bruker confirm this, though.
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Peter Eaton on Thu, Oct 11 2012
  • Re: MFM??????

    Hi Sandeep. MFM in contact mode makes very little sense...when close to the surface, magnetic force are completely swamped by other short range forces. It is necessary to remove the probe form the surface to detect magnetic forces. As John said, removing the probe a SHORT distance, with very flexible levers will be close to impossible in ambient conditions
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Peter Eaton on Thu, Jul 5 2012
  • Re: elastic properties using AFM??????

    Hi Sandeep, you can do this by Nanoindentation...this is available on all instruments. For literature, I would recommend you look at the section in chapter 3 of my book: Atomic Force Microscopy by Peter Eaton and Paul West, OUP (2010), ISBN:978-0-19-957045-4. There are also some examples of nanoindentation use to get elastic properties in chapter 7
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Peter Eaton on Tue, Mar 6 2012
  • Re: multimode photodiode

    Hi Stefano, As a "user", I would say that Ben's answer, is pretty much right. The "low noise" laser has a somewhat confusing name...for standard imaging AFM, in cases where laser interference is not an issue, it will not reduce noise. But, when laser lines do appear, they are a real pain, so it will definitely help in these cases
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Peter Eaton on Mon, Mar 5 2012
Page 1 of 3 (29 items) 1 2 3 Next > | More Search Options
Copyright (c) 2011 Bruker Instruments