The Nanoscale World

Search

  • Re: Calculating "separation" or "deformation"

    Thanks for the effort in repairing this demonstration. I hope that you saved it somewhere, for future reference! I have executed this experiment exactly, and then extended the idea to longer hold times which are more appropriate for my samples. I have three observations: First about half the time, the software objects with a message indicating failure
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Christopher on Thu, Jul 8 2010
  • Re: Calculating "separation" or "deformation"

    Is the PicoForce software usually installed? I do not see it on our computer. If not can I obtain a copy? Christopher
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Christopher on Thu, Jul 8 2010
  • Re: Calculating "separation" or "deformation"

    So that makes me think that a "creep" (force controlled) experiment is not possible. With closed loop on, the feedback is still keying in on a displacement (zsensor) not on a force (deformation). Does that sound correct? Also I was unable to capture data with the strip chart using the surface hold option. I can get relaxation data (displacement
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Christopher on Wed, Jun 23 2010
  • Re: Calculating "separation" or "deformation"

    Thanks for the response. I am using a newer Dimension Icon with NanoScope 8.10. I had tried the surface hold option, but I could not get data to be captured while the hold was taking place. Since then however, I think I understand the strip chart operations better and perhaps I can make it work now. A second question: with Closed loop on, will the system
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Christopher on Tue, Jun 22 2010
  • Re: PFQNM on relatively heterogenous samples

    Thanks for the response. I will try what you are suggesting and see how much error I am dealing with. The changes in indentation depth are not huge and the sharper the point, the slower the change in area with depth. Unfortunately I am using one of the cube corner nanoindentation probes for the high stiffness, which does have quite a bit of area change
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Christopher on Tue, Jun 22 2010
  • Calculating "separation" or "deformation"

    I am conducting some custom force spectroscopy tests and am interested in how much the tip penetrates the sample. I am measuring force relaxation to obtain viscoelastic properties. Presently, I am applying a specified Z ramp and I am holding this Z for a specified length of time while monitoring deflection error. I would like to know how deep the probe
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Christopher on Mon, Jun 21 2010
  • PFQNM on relatively heterogenous samples

    I am imaging and measuring mechanical properties of hardened portland cement paste. As you may (or may not) suspect these samples have fairly high surface heterogeneity arising from the intrinsic porosity even after thorough polishing. Additionally the paste is a composite of several phases from ~60GPa down to ~5GPa. As I understand, the "tip radius"
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Christopher on Fri, Jun 18 2010
Page 1 of 1 (7 items) | More Search Options
Copyright (c) 2011 Bruker Instruments