The Nanoscale World

Search

  • Re: 2D array of locations with probe positioning

    Hi Stefan, Thanks for your reply. I found out the reason. I clicked the zoom toolbutton on scanning window before I opened the Probe Positioning Window. So the frame button became the zoom toolbutton instead of 2D array positioning button. Zhuoyang
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Zhuoyang on Tue, Jun 28 2011
  • 2D array of locations with probe positioning

    Hi, I am doing force curve measurement on Innova. When I use probe toolbutton to add locations, I found that a 2D array of locations cannot be added by dragging a frame on the obtained images. Only a frame appear and no locations can be selected. But a line of locations or individual locations can be added. I wonder if there is any restriction on this
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Zhuoyang on Sun, Jun 26 2011
  • Re: Reducing imaging forces

    Hi Stefan, I couldn't find the application note #133 in the Bruker Media-Application notes. Could you please send me one copy? My email address is luzhuoyang@gmail.com. Thank you very much! Zhuoyang
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Zhuoyang on Fri, Jun 3 2011
  • Image Processing Problem

    Hi, I often meet the problem that when large features occure on a flat surface, the substrate becomes artificially lowered and the images looks like shadows behind the features. How could I use the Nanoscope software to elimintate these shadows. Thanks. Zhuoyang
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Zhuoyang on Wed, Jun 1 2011
  • Re: Reducing imaging forces

    Hi Stefan, Thanks for your answer. Our Nanodrive controller has an "IO-MOD+" board. Zhuoyang
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Zhuoyang on Tue, May 24 2011
  • Reducing imaging forces

    Hi, I want to reduce the imaging forces to about 50-100pN. How could I realise this in both contact and tapping mode? In contact mode, is it appropriate to adjust the setpoint until certain value that the forces are in the ranges above? In tapping mode, how could I adjust the drive amplitude to ~1nm, by reducing targeting tapping amplitude or setpoint
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Zhuoyang on Sun, May 22 2011
  • Re: Frequency Modulation

    Hi Stefan, I am applying AFM to organelle membrane patches. I haven't succeeded in scanning membrane proteins. Successfully engaging SNL probe is just a thing of a few days ago. At present only small protrusions of several hundreds of nm can be distinguished. When zoomed-in to a scan size of less than 100nm on the bilayer membrane, the profile began
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Zhuoyang on Wed, May 4 2011
  • Re: Frequency Modulation

    Hi Stefan, Could you please tell me whether the FM is better than AM, especially when scanning biological samples with ultra-high resolution in liquid. Is there any difference of "sensitivity" ? I read two papers scanning the same kind of sample, and it seems the FM image is clearer than AM image. Thank you! Zhuoyang
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Zhuoyang on Mon, May 2 2011
  • Frequency Modulation

    Hi, I read about Frequency Modulation AFM in some papers. How can I realise the function of FM-AFM? Is it possible to do this by Open Hardware? Plus, the scanning mode is tapping in liquid, not EFM. Many thanks, Zhuoyang
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Zhuoyang on Thu, Apr 28 2011
  • Re: Difficulty in engaging the SNL probe in liquid on Innova

    Hi Stefan, I think I have found out the reason. it indeed is far away from the sample surface. I set the distance of "withdraw tip" button to 0.4um, then engage (not successful), withdraw tip, and re-tune. I think the SNL resonace frequency is very strongly dependant on the distance between sample and tip.Now I can have the probe engaged successfully
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Zhuoyang on Sat, Apr 16 2011
Page 1 of 2 (17 items) 1 2 Next > | More Search Options
Copyright (c) 2011 Bruker Instruments