The Nanoscale World

Search

  • Re: QNM expected precision and tip wear

    Thanks for the advice. I had more time to analyze our tips (TAP525A) comparing before and after measurements. I am significantly wearing the tips (radius 8nm->~100nm) and also building up sample debris. I do have DDESP (DLC coated) tips that are less sharp to also try but am not sure if they are suitable for my sample hardness. Any suggestion on
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by jhurst on Thu, Jan 10 2013
  • QNM expected precision and tip wear

    Hi, I am new to QNM and am trying to measure the modulus of films (100's of nm thick on Si substrate) in the 5-10GPa range. (1) What kind of precision is expected for measurements calibrated to a reference and what procedure is recommend for comparing multiple samples ? I have been using the TAP525A tip, and noticed I am either getting tip contamination
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by jhurst on Fri, Jan 4 2013
  • Re: TUNA on oxides?

    Thanks for the tip suggestion and comments. I will give the solid metal tips a try since the SCM-PIC tips I've been using become non-conductive quickly. Would the DDESP tips survive longer under the biases needed for breakdown -- leading to better reproducibility?
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by jhurst on Wed, Sep 28 2011
  • TUNA on oxides?

    I am new to electrical measurements on the AFM and have been recently used our TUNA module on oxides (10-100 Ang.) for investigating breakdown. I have two main questions for anyone who has experience with these measurements. (1) I've started to come to the conclusion that I am only able to perform relative (non quantitative) comparisons between
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by jhurst on Fri, Sep 23 2011
Page 1 of 1 (4 items) | More Search Options
Copyright (c) 2011 Bruker Instruments