The Nanoscale World

Search

  • Re: Lithography using Nanoman

    Hi John, I have found a system on my campus that uses a closed loop configuration. The software used is pretty old (Nanoscope v5). I have to write a script in order to run it for lithography. I could locate the litho.h file in the v4 folder but not the gui.h file (perhaps because the system was upgraded from v4 to v5). The system does not have a C+
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by saumil on Tue, Apr 3 2012
  • Re: Lithography using Nanoman

    John, Thanks a lot for the reply and the comments. Unfortunately, I just found out from the people in the facility that the AFM is not closed loop and it needs a major hardware modification to do that. I had been assuming that it should be a closed loop system in XY, a mistake on my part. This is really sad news for me. Is there something that can be
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by saumil on Thu, Mar 22 2012
  • Re: Lithography using Nanoman

    Here is another image of oxidation on silicon I did today. This will explain the situation better.
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by saumil on Sun, Mar 18 2012
  • Lithography using Nanoman

    Hi all, I am using the Dimension 3100 AFM, with a Nanoscope IVa controller for nanolithography (anodic oxidation) using Nanoman. I am having a problem controlling the tip using the 'Path' mode in nanoman. If I draw a short line on the scanned image (using the path function), and press 'Do it', the software shows that it is drawing. But
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by saumil on Fri, Mar 16 2012
  • Re: Local anoidic oxidation lithography

    I think I understood it. Thanks.
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by saumil on Sun, Dec 11 2011
  • Re: Scratching Lithography using Innova

    Thanks Stefan. Yes, the software is v8.02 I think I might have figured out the cause of the problem. The software goes unresponsive if I do not group my objects in nanoplot. When I do the grouping, it works fine. Other than that I face problems when I use the z-depth feature and I can see the tip moving up and down in height, but making click-click
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by saumil on Sat, Dec 10 2011
  • Re: Local anoidic oxidation lithography

    Hello again Stefan, My sample is not conductive since I have a 300nm oxide layer on top of Si. I understand that I need a path for current to flow, so the sample must be grounded) but people have reported oxidation results on graphene keeping the sample floating also (and applying negative bias to the tip ~-20V or so). Can I apply an external bias to
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by saumil on Sat, Dec 10 2011
  • Re: Scratching Lithography using Innova

    Thanks a lot Stefan. Another problem I face after using NanoPlot is that I do not get any height scan at all. Here is what I do: Take a scan before lithography. Open the scan in nanoplot and etch. Then go back to take another scan. When I do this step, the software doesn't give me a scan at all. I just get no topography, it is all blank. I have
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by saumil on Wed, Dec 7 2011
  • Scratching Lithography using Innova

    Hello, I am working on lithography using the Innova system by scratching a PMMA resist layer. The problem I face is that there is always a tilt in the original scan. The tilt in the plane is 32nm in the x-x' axis and ~200nm in the y-y' direction of the scan. Next, when I do the scratching using NanoPlot, I apply a constant z-depth value and
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by saumil on Mon, Dec 5 2011
  • Re: Local anoidic oxidation lithography

    Stefan, That sounds excellent. I can bias the sample with the opposite polarity then. This was good to know. I am only concerned about leakage currents/safety but I will see if that is a concern or not. Thanks a lot
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by saumil on Tue, Nov 15 2011
Page 1 of 2 (12 items) 1 2 Next > | More Search Options
Copyright (c) 2011 Bruker Instruments