The Nanoscale World

Regarding EFM

rated by 0 users
Answered (Verified) This post has 1 verified answer | 3 Replies | 2 Followers

Top 500 Contributor
2 Posts
Points 24
gangaiah posted on Fri, Mar 22 2013 10:51 AM

We deposited 80 nm thick  gold film on a glass substrate and made a 6 um scratch. We carried out EFM at the gap. We observed that glass region looked more darker in both positive  and negative biasing (+/-1V) with 120 nm lift height.  Au film is a smooth and continuous film with out any Au nanoparticles.  As per my knowledge we should not observe any contrast. Could any one please explain this observation.

AFM system- Innova AFM

 

Thanks,

Gangaiah Mettela.

  • | Post Points: 12

Answered (Verified) Verified Answer

Answered (Verified) replied on Mon, Mar 25 2013 12:03 PM
Verified by gangaiah

Hi Gangaiah,

Why do you think there would be no contrast between gold and glass? You will have an attractive force when over the gold film and less so over the glass. That is exactly what you seem to observe.

What problem are you trying to adrerss using EFM?

Best regards,

Stefan

  • | Post Points: 13

All Replies

Answered (Verified) replied on Mon, Mar 25 2013 12:03 PM
Verified by gangaiah

Hi Gangaiah,

Why do you think there would be no contrast between gold and glass? You will have an attractive force when over the gold film and less so over the glass. That is exactly what you seem to observe.

What problem are you trying to adrerss using EFM?

Best regards,

Stefan

  • | Post Points: 13
Top 500 Contributor
2 Posts
Points 24

Dear Sir,

Thanks for reply. I could not understand why does Au get attract?

If surface is too rough (~150 nm) with holes is there a way to collect EFM in a precise way?

 

Thanks and regards,

Gangaiah

  • | Post Points: 12
replied on Thu, Mar 28 2013 11:43 AM

Hi Gangaiah,

 

You are having an electrostatic interaction between the sample and your tip that you are measuring. This is the origin of your signal that you observe. Surface roughness play of course a role and in general the smoother the surface is the "better" the measurement, i.e. you are less affected by artifacts arising from edges where suddenly the effective contact area of your tip changes. Your AFM is of course always operating with the same precision this is purely a matter of sample preparation.  Can you anneal your film or polish it?

Regards,

Stefan

  • | Post Points: 10
Page 1 of 1 (4 items) | RSS
Copyright (c) 2011 Bruker Instruments