The Nanoscale World

Tapping mode oscillation amplitudes - how to determine the physical amplitude from the RMS values/ setpoint. (Also imaging liquid surfaces, in liquids!!!)

rated by 0 users
Answered (Verified) This post has 1 verified answer | 2 Replies | 3 Followers

Top 200 Contributor
5 Posts
Points 56
karamathj posted on Thu, May 23 2013 12:46 PM

Dear experienced users!,

This is probably embarrassingly simple, but here goes... I want to know what amplitude, in nanometers, I am tapping with. I set my tune target to 1 V or thereabouts, the system seems to decide what setpt to use (I try to set it as close to 0.9 V or so to minimize forces, but it always seems to engage lower than that). In contact mode I know that for force curves one needs the V <-> nm conversion of the optical lever system. Is there a conversion factor I need in tapping mode to know the amplitude in nm???

I'm doing this because I'm trying to image oil drop surfaces. I've been very successful at this in air, but I always have to change my DRIVE AMPLITUDE after engage - increase it often by 5 or 6 times. This is to avoid a very jaggy image (the surface is followed but in a sawtooth way otherwise). The RMS increases only very slightly (although after retracting it shoots up). Does massively increasing the drive not mean I am massively increasing the amplitude of oscillation??? I'm caught between thinking I should use a large amplitude to get the RTESP tip the "energy" to escape the surface forces vs using tiny oscillations because, erm, I don't know, but large oscillations just seem wrong. Actually, I'm trying also to get images of the surfaces in water (in a liquid cell) too, with much more limited success. The trace and retrace really don't follow each other well. Ah - that's why I thought to use much smaller oscillations - I wanted to avoid moving the ambient water in the hope that this would improve the imaging.

Summary - (1) how can I find out the tapping mode oscillation amplitude in nanometers

(2) any tips on liquid surface imaging, especially in liquids and especially with reference to what amplitudes I should be using. I haven't found an article on this yet - if anyone knows of any, that would be great too!!!

Many many thanks in advance,

 

James Karamath

  • | Post Points: 12

Answered (Verified) Verified Answer

Top 75 Contributor
15 Posts
Points 167
Answered (Verified) 王硕 replied on Mon, May 27 2013 7:11 AM
Verified by karamathj

Dear James Karamath,

You should perform the amplitude-distance curve, and the so called amplitude-sensitivity can be determined. You can use this parameter to calculate your amplitude in nanometers.

I am very interest in imaging oil droplets. I perform fluid-tapping about a year. May I have your email address for further discussion.

 

Yours sincerely,

Wang Shuo

  • | Post Points: 13

All Replies

Top 75 Contributor
15 Posts
Points 167
Answered (Verified) 王硕 replied on Mon, May 27 2013 7:11 AM
Verified by karamathj

Dear James Karamath,

You should perform the amplitude-distance curve, and the so called amplitude-sensitivity can be determined. You can use this parameter to calculate your amplitude in nanometers.

I am very interest in imaging oil droplets. I perform fluid-tapping about a year. May I have your email address for further discussion.

 

Yours sincerely,

Wang Shuo

  • | Post Points: 13
Top 200 Contributor
5 Posts
Points 56

Hello Wang,

Thank you for that - it makes sense. My email is karamathj@hotmail.com for future correspondance. I would be very interested to here from you.

Kind regards,

James K

 

  • | Post Points: 10
Page 1 of 1 (3 items) | RSS
Copyright (c) 2011 Bruker Instruments