The Nanoscale World

EFM phase shift signals mismatch in "scan" and "ramp" regimes

rated by 0 users
Not Answered This post has 0 verified answers | 1 Reply | 2 Followers

Top 500 Contributor
3 Posts
Points 34
virggis posted on Mon, Mar 16 2015 11:23 AM

Hi all,

I have a question about EFM measurements in "scan" and "ramp" modes. The strange thing is that EFM phase shift values in interleave (lift) mode on the same sample surface area are different. Below is the picture illustrating this mismatch. In the left side is the image of EFM phase difference distribution the surface of GaAs based device with p-n junction. Graph in the upper right corner is the cross section of the scan, the highlighted black dot is on the n-type region and light blue one is on the p-type region. When scanning  bias between the sample and SPM tip was -1V. After the scan point and shoot ramping was performed over the surface in the areas highlighted with the color dots in section graph. These ramp curves are shown in the lover right corner of the picture. In contrast to the phase shift values acquired in scan mode, the values of ramp mode (when bias = -1V ) significantly differs. Lift height in ramp mode was controlled by photodetector signal as feedback value. Is there some software problem, or the signals in phase channels in ramp and scan modes are not the same? For measurements the Dimension 3100/ Nanoscope IVa system was used with SCM-PIT probes. The software version NanosScope 6.14R1.

 

 

  • | Post Points: 12

All Replies

Top 10 Contributor
62 Posts
Points 660

Hi,

1. The top right trace plot is tilted. Did you flatten the image? For the phase image, the real-time and off-line planefit functions should be set to "non2"

2. During the scanning, you can precisely control the lift height in the interleave scan. However, under the ramp mode, you can:

(a) the tip is in contact with the sample, and you can control the force by the deflection error.

(b) the tip is away from the sample. However, the distance between the tip and the sample cannot be controlled.

(c) either (a) or (b), the tip-sample distance will be different from the lift height you set in the real-time scanning. So, it is not surprised to get different phase results.

3. If you look at the delta, they are very similar. It seems you keep the tip in contact with the sample.

Please let me know if you have more questions.

Thanks,

Teddy

  • | Post Points: 10
Page 1 of 1 (2 items) | RSS
Copyright (c) 2011 Bruker Instruments