The Nanoscale World

MPP-32100-10 tip data analysis

rated by 0 users
Not Answered This post has 0 verified answers | 3 Replies | 2 Followers

Top 500 Contributor
2 Posts
Points 24
RVargas posted on Wed, Dec 19 2012 3:35 PM

Hi,

I'm using AFM to measure the Young's modulus (E) of cells. I typically
use the Hertz or Sneddon's equation (which require a tip angle) to calculate E based on
force-displacement data. For most tip geometries (sphere, square pyramid, cone) the calculation is
pretty straight forward. However, for the MPP-32100-10 tip the geometry is described as Rotated (Symmetric)
and there are 3 different angles listed (front, back and side angle).

What equation/ angle would you recommend using for data analysis?

Thanks!

  • | Post Points: 12

All Replies

replied on Thu, Jan 10 2013 5:18 AM

I think my answer didn't go through...

Once again: I hardly use Hertz on cells but in that case, the equation is fairly easy. If using Sneddon, the correct anglt should be the BACK angle (25 deg. in that case).

May I ask your opinion about those probes (I never had a chance to test them) in terms of measured modulus and quality/stability of imaging?

Thanks and good luck!

 

Alex.

  • | Post Points: 12
Top 500 Contributor
2 Posts
Points 24

Thanks for your response Alex.

I haven't use these tips for imaging, just for a few measurements of modulus.

I found them to give values similar to other pyramidal tips but they seem to be more damaging to the cells.

  • | Post Points: 12
replied on Thu, Jan 17 2013 2:44 AM

Usually the tips which are really damaging to the cells are the ones:

1) that have a silicone (not Si3N4 but pure silicone) ending.

2) that have a pyramidal shape (like the OTR for instance, which are very good to image proteins but not suitable for cells).

Let me know how it goes.

Good luck,

Alex.

  • | Post Points: 10
Page 1 of 1 (4 items) | RSS
Copyright (c) 2011 Bruker Instruments