The Nanoscale World

Search

  • Re: Tip problems during the AFM scanning

    Hi, Alex, Thank you very much for your reply. Here are my comments for your suggestions: 1) What type of flow should be employed in the PSI, the same culture medium used? 2) Actually, I've contacted the Team Nanotec for higher tips, but I am not sure if they are able to make a suitable probe as they claim that they have no experience of biological
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Fenny on Wed, Jun 20 2012
  • Tip problems during the AFM scanning

    Hi, can anyone please give some advice on the following problems of AFM Catalyst scanning and force measurement with the PFQNM mode? 1. How to remove the debris adhered to the tip in situ during the scanning of adhesive samples like cells, without changing the tip? Change of tips would take too much time, especially we have to calibrate the tip again
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Fenny on Sat, May 19 2012
  • AFM catalyst on live cells

    Hello, I’ve got several questions concerning AFM catalyst on live cells. Can anyone help me with the following? 1. As we may need to order some probes on demand, what is the typical shape of probes for live cell mechanical measurement, cone or pyramidal? And how shall we set the angle and frequency of probes? 2. How can I export the force and
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Fenny on Fri, Mar 9 2012
  • About mode selection in AFM Catalyst

    What kind of an experimental Category (Scanayst, tapping,contact,….) shall I choose for the following cases? 1) Only the morphology of samples needs imaging? 2) Only the force curves of local regions from biological samples are needed without morphology? Thanks.
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Fenny on Tue, Mar 6 2012
  • Re: Do we need a planefit before doing analysis?

    Got it. Thanks, John
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Fenny on Thu, Feb 2 2012
  • Do we need a planefit before doing analysis?

    When analysing data of a specified portion of images, is a planefit necessary beforehand? I know it's typical to apply a second- or third-order Flatten or Plane fit to the image before using Roughness analysis if the image shows signs of second- or third-order distortion (e.g., bow due to large scans on large scanners), but I am not sure as the
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Fenny on Mon, Jan 30 2012
  • About tip qualification from characterizer image

    1.Do we need to ensure the number of peaks in ETD to be just 1 when estimating tip radius from this height? Actually, I found the tip radius estimated in the absolute method far below the nom value (at least 5 times smaller), after inputting the average deformation into the Height 1 from Apex field. 2. By the way, I've tried both the image roughness
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Fenny on Wed, Jan 18 2012
  • Re: Does the QNMOffline need a QNM key?

    I see, thanks a lot.
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Fenny on Wed, Jan 18 2012
  • Does the QNMOffline need a QNM key?

    1. I find the Nanoscope Anaysis (latest version downloaded) invalid in the force curve analysis. Once I open the HSDC file, and click on the QNM-Hsdc Force Curve-Image icon, I get this warning message: The QNMOffline needs either QNMOffline or HaarmoniX or PeakForceQNM Key. Then after I load the image, the interface would show incomplete, the force
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Fenny on Mon, Jan 16 2012
  • How to clean an AFM tip with cellular debris?

    When performing contact mode of AFM on biological samples such as cells, it is very easy for tips adhered and contaminated by cellular debris, how can we clean the tip then instead of replacing it? In chemical or mechanical way?
    Posted to SPM Digest (Forum) by Fenny on Mon, Oct 17 2011
Page 1 of 2 (11 items) 1 2 Next > | More Search Options
Copyright (c) 2011 Bruker Instruments